| Get the EPUK Weekly News ! |
Once a week we put together a roundup of the week's photography, media and copyright news. It's interesting, free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime. So what's stopping you ?
| This week we discussed... |
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
![]() |
2. The Essentials
The most important thing to remember about the 1988 Act is that, like Magna Carta, that other great symbol of protest against unjust treatment at the hands of the powerful, it redresses a long term injustice, giving photographers the legal status of authors of their own work, control over the rights in it, how it is used and the right to a credit.
|
|||
What is copyright?Copyright is a property right vested in works which authors have created. The law of copyright…...protects against unauthorised reproduction of works and entitles copyright owners to economic benefit whilst seeking a fair balance between the interests of authors and users of copyright materials. What are moral rights?These are:
Copyright law originally came into being to ensure that individual craftsmen received proper economic compensation for the products of their craftsmanship. The problem for photographers was always that UK law excluded them from first ownership of copyright when work was commissioned and therefore denied them the protection and benefits afforded to composers, illustrators, writers and painters, etc. Largely because of the lobbying of 19th century portrait painters who felt threatened by the advent of photography, the work of British photographers and engravers became treated as a copying technique and, unless it was agreed otherwise, copyright was vested in the commissioner rather than the author of the work. This view of photography, apart from being basically unfair, was contrary to legislation in much of the rest of the world and has led to confusion at one time or another for nearly everyone involved, either as creator or user. The implementation of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 has done a lot to improve the situation although many people, including photographers themselves, still have to cope with rights in photography generated under legislation going back to 1862, which were left largely intact by the 1988 Act and now also have to deal with the complications produced by the copyright harmonisation measures brought in throughout the European Union and the European Economic Area. (Like the European Union, the European Economic Area is defined by international agreement and may vary over time. Readers needing to know the membership of the EEA are therefore advised to check on the latest position at the time their need arises). |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © Dundee photographer Nick McGowan-Lowe. Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|