| EPUK Weekly News |
Once a week we put together a roundup of the week's photography, media and copyright news. It's free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.
| This week EPUK discussed ... |
The Bristol Film Office and their photography permits; The Independent publishing pictures without permission; the shift and day rates paid by the Dailies
… and …
why PR firms hire photographers just for show.
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
|
Police contradictions over 'journalists database' spark NUJ complaintSolicitors acting for the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) are to make a formal complaint to the Data Commissioner over the failure of the Met police to provide details under the Data Protection Act of their surveillance of journalists. |
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
16 June 2009
|
Solicitors acting for the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) are to make a formal complaint to the Data Commissioner over the failure of the Met police to provide details under the Data Protection Act of their surveillance of journalists. The NUJ is also complaining about apparently contradictory claims by the police as to the existence of a database containing images of journalists. In May, head of public order policing (CO11) Commander Bob Broadhurst told the NUJ Photographers’ Conference that journalists could be photographed if they were regularly seen at protests, but told the audience: “There is no [CO11] database as such”. However, the Metropolitan Police disclosed in March to Liberty that “there is indeed a database of images, searchable by name, held within CO11”. The disclosure came as part of a successful legal challenge backed by the civil liberties organisation over the power of the police to photograph peaceful attendees at protests.
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Comments on this article:
Add your comments here:
|
||||||
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © Edinburgh photographer Nick McGowan-Lowe. Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|
To answer Commander Broadhurst’s presscard question, I’d say yes, anyone can apply and get a card. There seems to be 5 new snappers a week coming out of the woodwork in London and they all have presscards. Not many of them are professional photographers. Some are students, camera shop sales people or believe it or not even ex-coppers! The presscards are too easy to obtain and are therefore, devalued.
Surely, it needs to be reviewed.
Comment #1 posted by david at 15 November, 11:52 PM