EPUK Editorial Photographers United Kingdom and Ireland. The private mailing list and public resource for editorial photographers

Guardian Weekend caught running second rights-grab competition

9 December 2007 - EPUK

The Guardian – a newspaper which prides itself on its fair treatment of professional photographers – appears to have no qualms about running competitions which exploit amateur photographers, after being caught running a lucrative ‘rights-grabbing’ competition for the second time.

The move comes just over a year since a spokesperson for the Guardian reassured readers that The Guardian would “always support fair terms and conditions for photographers” after being forced into a u-turn by the competition sponsor.

The Sony/Guardian Unseen Britain competition invites entries, the best of which will be used in a Sony Unseen Britain advertisement feature in the Guardian Weekend magazine on February 17 2008 as well as being featured in an exhibition and online. One top winning entry will win a prize of a Sony α700 Digital SLR worth “around £1,300”, with the remainer of the ‘winning’ featured entries used not receiving anything at all.

As part of the terms, all entrants must agree to granting a wide-ranging licence for Sony and The Guardian to use all submitted photographs, But while Sony’s licence applies just “for the purposes of any promotional activity conducted by Sony in relation to this Competition”, The Guardian’s licence is “a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free, worldwide licence to republish any image(s) you submit to GNM in any format, including without limitation print and electronic format (for example in The Guardian Weekend supplement, on www.guardian.co.uk , and in book or other compilation format)”, allowing it to use any photographs well beyond the scope of the original competition.

One entrant who noticed the terms only after entering the competition told EPUK: “I’m screwed because I didn’t read the small print. Disgusting.”

Referring to rights-grabbing competitions in general, Mark Stephens, a leading media lawyer for Finers Stephens Innocent, has previously told EPUK: “The practice of using photo competitions which require photographers to give up their copyright seem to be to be a thinly veiled attempt at conning them out of their creative rights just so a large corporate can fatten up their picture stock.”

Rights-grabbing competitions “extremely bad practice”

Sony’s sponsorship of the competition contrasts with that stance taken by most camera manufacturers who refuse to sponsor competitions which treat the entrants unfairly.

Last September Canon told EPUK: “Canon treats photographers and their copyright with the greatest of respect, and would never ask them to agree to [rights-grabbing terms] as part of a competition”. When Canon were indeed found to be sponsoring such a competition a month later, they were instrumental in forcing the Guardian to change the terms.

Pentax said “If we were asked to sponsor a competition where such terms were included, we would talk to the organiser and make it clear that we felt that this was extremely bad practice”

A spokesperson for Olympus told EPUK: “When we run competitions, we only ever ask for permission to use the winning photographs to promote the competition itself…we would be very, very uncomfortable with such terms. We wouldn’t really want to be involved with any such competition.

Previous Guardian rights-grab

Last year the Guardian was forced into a climbdown by the National Union of Journalists and co-sponsor Canon over it’s weekly “In Pictures” competition after the Guardian attempted to claim copyright over all submitted photographs.

After EPUK revealed the rights-grab, The Guardian first claimed the terms were “not up to our usual high standard” and an “oversight” – before replacing them with almost identical clauses.

The Guardian then refused to discuss the matter any further with EPUK or make any further changes to the terms, and it was only because of the intervention of the NUJ and competition sponsor Canon that the rules were finally changed.

Guardian Weekend picture editor and competition judge Kate Edwards did not reply to an email asking for clarification of the competition terms.

Want to contact the EPUK Website editor? editor@epuk.org

Comments

EPUK,

If possible, include email address of people such as Kate Edwards in your rights-grab articles (or similar) so we can give them a piece of our minds directly en mass…

Thanks,
Pete

Comment 1: Pete Fontaine, 2 March 2008, 10:55 PM

Comment on this article

(Your email will not appear on your comment, but we cannot accept your comment without one. We won't give your email address to anyone else)
(You don't need to enter your website address, but if you do, your post will link to it)
 

EPUK reserves the right to edit or delete posts which the moderators feel are irrelevant, offensive, libelous, untrue or just plain nutty; and in extreme cases, to ban those who make them.


EPUK is discussing:

Copyright infringements and how to manage them DACS Payback'Crafted in Britain' by Rob Scott Photographing in public places - where/when/is it allowed?

What is EPUK?

EPUK is an email group for professional editorial photographers who want to talk business. We don’t do techie stuff or in-crowd gossip. We don’t talk cameras or computers. What we talk about are the nuts and bolts of being in business - like copyright, licensing, fees and insurance.

Donate to EPUK

EPUK is run on a not-for-profit basis, funded solely by advertising, donations and hosting other lists. You can make a donation to EPUK through Paypal here:

Donate Now with PayPal

Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors.