EPUK Editorial Photographers United Kingdom and Ireland. The private mailing list and public resource for editorial photographers

Independent titles to abandon digital and return to shooting on film

1 April 2007 - EPUK

In less than 24 hours, the Independent and Independent on Sunday photographers are to abandon digital photography, and are to return to shooting solely on black and white 35mm film stock, EPUK has learned.

According to editor-in-chief Simon Kelner, who spoke to EPUK briefly on Friday to confirm the rumours, the move back from digital to 35mm film will allow it to reconnect with its reputation for innovative monochrome photojournalism from when the daily title was first set up in 1986.

“Nowadays, newspaper photographers tend to be sent from photocall to photocall, with no time to interpret an idea. We want to give them the space and the time to allow them to visually interpret a news event as best they can, and allowing them to shoot on film seemed an important part of that”, he said.

Move to film “begins tomorrow”

“Unless there are any difficulties over the weekend, the picture desk will begin on Monday to work on a part analogue, part digital basis, with the majority of commissioned work being shot on film”, said Kelner.

“Realistically speaking, we have to accept that the vast majority of wire service pictures from Reuters, PA and the like are still going to be supplied digitally, and we need to work with that. But as anyone who looks through the paper can tell you, we don’t use that many wire pictures anyway.”

Regarding the main advantage of digital – the direct and speedy delivery to the picture desk of pictures from the scene of a breaking news story – Kelner claims it is less important at the self proclaimed “views paper”, where front pages tend to be dominated by “bigger issue” stories such as global warming rather than hard news events.

An editorial move to “wider issue” campaigns has led to speculation that the Independent on Sunday may be relaunched in a weekly magazine format, something which Kelner strongly denies.

Your new camera is…an F3


The old versus the new…

Nikon F3

Produced: 1980-2002.
Controls: manual and aperture-priority exposure modes; aperture set on the lens. Manual focus (except F3AF)
Motor drive: external MD4, 13fps (F3H only), 5.5fps (all other models)
Flash sync: 1/60th
Price: £100 (secondhand, ebay)

Canon EOS 1Ds Mk II

Produced: 2005 onwards.
Controls: manual, aperture priority, shutter priority, program, autofocus
Motor drive: 4fps
Flash sync: 1/250th
Price: £4500 (new, Calumet)

Investment in new equipment by parent group Independent News & Media Group (INM), described by one insider as “at the low end of four figures”, will see staff photographers and contracted freelances working with Nikon F3s and F4s, and shooting solely on Kodak Tri-X. One token digital SLR, a Kodak DCS-100, is to be kept at the picture desk in the unlikely event of staff photographers needing to cover a breaking news story.

Shot film will then be biked by courier back to the newsroom at One Canary Wharf, before being processed by hand and edited. Final 10×8” Ilford prints will then be drum scanned and transmitted over an analogue telephone line to the printing press where it will be handled by members of the National Graphical Association who have been invited to oversee and implement the necessary changes in working practices.

Other accusations that the move has been introduced to cut costs are “simply wrong”, says picture editor Lynn Cullen, although she conceded that the sale would generate some short term income for the titles. “When we sold off our film cameras in 1999, we actually made a tidy sum out of them. Now we’re buying back pretty much the same cameras, but for a fraction of what we got for them originally. Plus we’ll get thousands from the sale of our digital equipment.”

“Unsurprisingly, film cameras are dirt cheap on Ebay at the moment”, she added. “And 5×4 is even cheaper. That might be the next step.”

Reinvention in a shrinking market

Faced with a shrinking newspaper market, flatlining sales and against tough competition from the Times and the Guardian, the Independent titles are no stranger to bold moves to distinguish themselves from the competition. The daily was the first British tabloid to downsize to a tabloid format in 2003, a move which immediately increased circulation by 15%, and which was followed by all other national daily broadsheets except the Telegraph.

Rejecting the collective received wisdom of his fellow editors, Kelner denies that print editions of newspapers are in terminal decline. In an interview with MediaGuardian two weeks ago, he said “ I completely reject the idea that newspapers are on some sort of slippery slope”. On the subject of newspaper websites, on which he is notoriously sceptical, he added: “I’ve never met anyone who ever listens to podcasts”.

“I’ve never baulked from making my own mind up, despite what other editors say or do. At the Independent, we don’t believe in throwing money down the drain at our websites, and we don’t believe in outmoded ideas like paying our freelances on time. If at all. Not if I can help it”, he told EPUK.

“Everyone remembers that the Independent titles were founded on innovation, but what they forget is that sometimes you have to take big leaps to innovate. Most of our rivals think only in terms of leaps forward, whereas we’re happy to be taking a giant leap backwards. If there’s one thing I’ve learnt about about the newspaper industry is that its not the direction but the size of the leap that really counts.”

Nevertheless, while it seems unlikely that any other national titles will follow the Independent’s lead, only time will tell whether the bold move will continue to revive the Independent’s sales in a declining market.

Despite this, Kelner remains bullish about the prospects for the photojournalism-led titles: “We’ve spent a lot of time in focus groups fine-tuning this, and one thing I can say with confidence is – film is the future.”

Want to contact the EPUK Website editor? editor@epuk.org

Comments

Ha Ha Ha

Pete J

Comment 1: Pete Jenkins, 1 April 2007, 10:04 AM

Fantastic – you cannot beat the satisfaction of interpreting a story using black and white film. I have just purchased dark room equipment and am focusing my personal work on monochrome. Rather a sore throat from chemicals than ruin my eyes on the Mac!! Congrats…..

Comment 2: Gail Ward, 1 April 2007, 10:17 AM

I thought it was an April fools piece until I got to the bit about freelancers being paid on time, if at all.

Comment 3: Clive, 1 April 2007, 10:26 AM

Very good.

Comment 4: paul burgman, 1 April 2007, 10:53 AM

I was looking for a good April Fool’s gag this morning. Nice one :)

Comment 5: Ian H, 1 April 2007, 10:59 AM

Hilarious!!! We deal in lost and found items and I guarantee if an F3 was found I wouldn’t want it back.

Comment 6: Edward White, 1 April 2007, 12:10 PM

Holy Shit, I’ve just sold off the last of my film gear. I think there may be an Ilford disposable lying around somewhere. I’ll dig it out; just in case!

Comment 7: Jason Bye, 1 April 2007, 12:42 PM

Thank God. It’s about time a newspaper went back to REAL journalism! I’m in the United States… but couldn’t be happier that someone realized that film is better. Today is a good day!

Comment 8: Zoe Wiseman, 1 April 2007, 01:26 PM

Got to make sure I buy a couple of film cameras on eBay today before it’s too late!

Comment 9: Tatiana, 1 April 2007, 04:05 PM

bloody brill – as good as the spaghetti on trees joke.

Comment 10: Emma, 1 April 2007, 07:05 PM

Much as I hate to break the hearts of Kodak Tri-X lovers worldwide, it’s time now to swap the “EPUK Exclusive” tag for a tag that reflects today’s date….

Comment 11: The EPUK Website Editor, 1 April 2007, 08:38 PM

That’s lame. Thanks for starting another digital vs. film war. Should have known it would be too good to be true. Oh well.

Comment 12: Zoe Wiseman, 1 April 2007, 08:48 PM

Outstanding! Finally an editor with the guts to say he’s happy to be taking a giant leap backwards into the darkroom. That’s photojournalism baby! Film rules!

Comment 13: Rick Eaton, 2 April 2007, 02:41 AM

I am heart broken…. Its a joke! Its like having a dream where you own a big ship and then you wake up and you don’t own a ship at all. And then you have to go to work in the rain not owning a ship. Its that kind of a tragedy.

Comment 14: Dan, 2 April 2007, 07:18 AM

For that I talk to god everyday…and every night.

Comment 15: Luiz santos, 27 April 2007, 11:52 AM

The Indie going back to film?
It must be a pun to sell film cameras on ebay.
Whats wrong with monochrome prints from digital?

Comment 16: Henry Vernon, 21 May 2007, 12:02 PM

I wish the publications here in Florida would encourage more film use, and maybe even run more black and white.

Comment 17: Al Kaplan, 24 September 2007, 02:00 AM

Comment on this article

(Your email will not appear on your comment, but we cannot accept your comment without one. We won't give your email address to anyone else)
(You don't need to enter your website address, but if you do, your post will link to it)
 

EPUK reserves the right to edit or delete posts which the moderators feel are irrelevant, offensive, libelous, untrue or just plain nutty; and in extreme cases, to ban those who make them.


EPUK is discussing:

Copyright infringements and how to manage them DACS Payback'Crafted in Britain' by Rob Scott Photographing in public places - where/when/is it allowed?

What is EPUK?

EPUK is an email group for professional editorial photographers who want to talk business. We don’t do techie stuff or in-crowd gossip. We don’t talk cameras or computers. What we talk about are the nuts and bolts of being in business - like copyright, licensing, fees and insurance.

Donate to EPUK

EPUK is run on a not-for-profit basis, funded solely by advertising, donations and hosting other lists. You can make a donation to EPUK through Paypal here:

Donate Now with PayPal

Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors.