EPUK Editorial Photographers United Kingdom and Ireland. The private mailing list and public resource for editorial photographers

Met Police to relax London photography restrictions in pilot scheme

1 April 2008 - EPUK

A pilot scheme set to begin next month will see the Metropolitan Police taking a less restrictive approach to street photography in the capital by agreeing not to approach registered photographers.

The move comes at a time when both amateur and professional photographers working in the capital have claimed that they have been stopped and questioned by police, or have been told that they cannot photograph in public places.

A recent poster campaign by the Metropolitan Police listed photography as a potential indicator of terrorist activity, and last Friday NUJ General Secretary Jeremy Dear held a one-man protest against restrictions placed on press photographers by police officers.

The opt-in scheme, devised by the Metropolitan Police and known as Photo Safety Identity Checking Observation (PSICO), will enable photographers’ identities to be monitored in sensitive locations such as near government and military buildings, embassies, airports, bus and railway stations, schools, shops, banks, pubs and restaurants and anywhere else the public is potentially vulnerable to photo reconnaissance by terrorists and sexual predators.

According to one senior police officer familiar with the project, photography presents a unique problem for law enforcement because it is not illegal: “A lot of people are relatively harmless with their use of cameras, so the problem becomes one of trying to find out who the bad guys really are. Obviously we will check criminal records, but since street photography is not yet technically an offence this is not adequate”

‘No different to CCTV

Photographers who wish to photograph in the pilot area will be required to first register at Charing Cross police station bringing either a driving license, passport or birth certificate, and by paying an administration fee.

After registration, which can take up to 28 days, photographers wanting to photograph on the street will have to again attend either Charing Cross police station to be issued with a thin fluorescent waistcoat fitted with an RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tag which is to be worn over other clothing.

The police source close to the project told EPUK: “RFID is a proven, cheap commercial technology that is used widely by supermarkets. We really don’t see why anyone who has nothing to hide will not carry a tag and we don’t forsee any objections from responsible photographers.”

“People already accept CCTV, safety cameras, ANPR, the congestion charge, tracker systems for cars and the tagging of offenders for probation. This is really no different.”

EPUK Exclusive Photo: A prototype RFID is seen within a waistcoat similar to the one accredited photographers are expected be issued with. The device shown is less than 4mm thick, and is flexible enough to bend round the body.

PSICO operates to a range of around 100m and like most RFID is a passive device that needs no batteries. A number of prototypes have already been tested, including an anklet, adapted from that worn by ASBO curfew subjects, a wristband, or a chip embedded in a UK national press card.

Scheme ‘likely to be extended’

While the pilot scheme covers an area less than one kilometre square, advisors to the Metropolitan Police say they are confident that the technology involved is scalable to cover the entire city. If the three-month pilot proves successful, the opt-in scheme looks likely to be gradually extended throughout the capital from 2009 onwards.

The scheme is bounded on the north side by Shaftesbury Avenue between Piccadilly Circus and Holborn underground station, and in its first phase will only cover as far south as the Strand, Leicester Square and Covent Garden. The area was chosen in part because of the high numbers of tourists with cameras in these area, but a relatively small number of security-sensitive locations.

The area covered by the pilot scheme

The 48 police-controlled closed circuit cameras in this area have been upgraded to include technology previously used by anti-piracy organisations to detect camcorders being used in cinemas. Based on Trakstar’s ‘Pirate Eye’ system, the cameras send out pulses of light which are almost indetectable by the human eye. An independent review of the in-cinema technology concluded that it had “minimal impact” on those scanned.

The pulses of light are reflected back by the coating on camera lenses, and triangulation between separate CCTV cameras allows police to see a real-time map of where photographers are working. Each of these spots is then cross-referenced with the radio-transmitted position of accredited photographers wearing RFID jackets, with police officers being sent to intercept unregistered photographers.

‘Protecting the public from antisocial photography’

The Met declined to comment officially on the scheme which has not yet been formally announced. EPUK understands from a police source close to the project but who asked not to be identified, that the scheme will not be compulsory. However anyone photographing without a remotely checkable PSICO tag is likely to be intercepted by officers and their activities challenged.

A senior police officer told EPUK: “Far too many people are carrying and using cameras in complete anonymity and absolutely nobody is keeping an eye on what they are doing with them. This is clearly a threat that makes it impossible for the public to feel safe, and PSICO will go a long way to protect them from dangerous and antisocial photography. We will know exactly who is photographing what, and if there is anything suspicious we can take them off the street.”

According to the source, different levels of permission will be associated with different levels of identity vetting and cost, which varies between £95 to £295 per year. At its most secure and costly level the scheme is expected to replace the National Press Card, in theory allowing access to some restricted areas, such as Downing Street, without police checking.

Asked whether current national press card ‘gatekeeper’ organisations were aware of this initiative, EPUK’s source said that it was ‘chip and PIN for the press card and irresistible’. There will nevertheless be full consultation with the NUJ and other interested parties once the scheme is up and running.

“Using PSICO-PRO bona fide news-gatherers won’t have to rummage in their wallet for a press card, the embedded chip means officers will know exactly who they are and can decide whether they merit cooperation or not before they even arrive”

Most amateur photographers will need a £95/year PSICO-BASIC tag. This will permit casual photography in locations where security allows. ‘We are not trying to stop people taking snaps, that would be ridiculous. But if CCTV operators see a BASIC-tagged photographer hanging around, using a pro camera with a long lens, or taking pictures at 3am, then of course we’ll probably want to have a word with them.’

While in the past many photographers would have got away with such images, the PSICO terms allow for on-the-spot inspection and deletion of any images that the attending officer deems unacceptable, accompanied by fixed penalty fines.

In addition, initial vetting and security checks will determine clearance. For example middle aged men with beards may not be allowed to photograph near schools, whilst Arabic speakers could be prevented from trainspotting.

‘Substantial contibution to public safety’

Tourists will be issued with a special time-limited form of tag embedded in a ‘Welcome to London’ badge, that allows photography at popular venues such as Madame Tussaud’s and the House of Commons. The EPUK source added that ‘we also see PSICO being useful in catching illegal immigrants and visitors who have outstayed their visas only to abuse the UK’s liberal attitudes to photography, and many of these may be possible terrorists’.

‘We have had to devise heuristic methods of anticipating unacceptable camera use” said the police source. “The ultimate aim is to first record, then assess what kind of photos applicants take and why, in much the same way that credit card companies spot unusual or suspicious transactions”

“If, say, someone who normally takes pictures of cats and sunsets is detected photographing somewhere like Heathrow where there are no cats or sunsets, then the system will flag them up, and – certainly at a sensitive location like Heathrow – we would take them down fast.”

“This really is new territory for the police’s use of technology in gathering intelligence, so the vetting procedure includes quite unconventional means : profiling subject’s use of the internet, email screening through the RIP Act and so on, checking credit card and loyalty card history to see if they buy photography books from Amazon or telephoto lenses from eBay or houmous
from Sainsburys, for example.”

“ We will check them out on Google, Facebook, and already we have most of Flickr profiled for a range of behaviours that we think are odd. Obviously I can’t be too precise for security reasons, but we would obviously pay attention to any photos that are not just snapshots.”

‘Cameras are potentially more dangerous than guns’

“This isn’t perfect by any means but it’s a substantial contribution to public safety, and we will be pressing digital camera manufacturers to integrate PSICO so that the camera itself contributes to the monitoring. We aren’t sure yet what form
this may take, because GPS and G3 technology won’t be in all cameras for a few years yet. We will be pressing to move toward a situation where cameras will report the taking of barred photographs enabling the automatic issue of fixed penalties, or will lock and alert security forces when certain images are attempted such as an airliner.”

“This may sound like science fiction right now, but cameras are potentially more dangerous than guns in the wrong hands and we believe the public fully understands the risks if unrestricted photography is allowed to spiral out of control.”

The PSICO scheme is expected to be officially announced next week by Mayor Ken Livingstone as part of his election campaign against photography, drugs and street crime.

Want to contact the EPUK Website editor? editor@epuk.org

Comments

Good one, 1 April etc

While were here, Getty and Adobe are creating a charitable trust for disenchanted photographers

Comment 1: Bill Bunter, 1 April 2008, 10:06 AM

You nearly had me there.

Comment 2: Simon Bainbridge, 1 April 2008, 10:57 AM

Sweet, cheered me up….you must be so bored up in EPUK towers to have the time to write something as long winded as this one…
Brian Harris

Comment 3: Brian Harris, 1 April 2008, 11:25 AM

Tourist or Terrorist?

A million tourists in London with cameras…..so they’re going to know whose photographing what? Like hell. Meanwhile the terrorist is on google maps plotting his/her actions……. is this intelligent policing?? Or North Korea style censorship?

Comment 4: Mr Jones, 1 April 2008, 01:32 PM

april the 1st ! but if its true its another step down a police state.

Comment 5: chris, 1 April 2008, 02:14 PM

There’s a policeman who knows what heuristic means? Heh.

Wonderfully scary.

Comment 6: brendadadada, 1 April 2008, 10:20 PM

A heuristic is someone who practices voyheurism with a DLR, as any CSO kno.

Comment 7: Tony Sleep, 2 April 2008, 12:26 AM

Voyheurism – the level of which is directly proportional to the focal length of the lens being used, which makes Local Government who spy on everyone king of the voyheurism.

Comment 8: chris, 2 April 2008, 09:31 AM

Hah, of course!

Comment 9: brendadadada, 3 April 2008, 08:55 AM

Got me that one, been all het up about moving back to the UK and how hard it is here now to take photos and this just added to the anger. Stupid Damon!

Comment 10: Damon Coulter, 11 April 2008, 07:55 PM

Its scares me to say anything these days.That in its self says a lot. Anyway a camera is not more dangourse than a gun unless you are beating someone to death with it. £95-295 a year just another undeniable TAX. If people try controlling other people you get terrorist for what is a terrorist someone fighting back! it is all sad that we live in a world like this I for one just wish that it would all just stop and everyone just gets on with the next guy. I think that we all need to cool off before another 9/11 no one wants to see that again…

Comment 11: Chris, 5 July 2008, 02:40 PM

Great April 1st story but flag it more prominently now that it isn’t 1st April anymore! It just blends right in with:
“Birmingham police officer ‘forced press photographer to delete images’”
and
“Plod prevents pics of Postman Pat”
etc.

Comment 12: Rob, 15 July 2008, 02:34 PM

@ Rob,

Yes, we should really have a large sign at the top left of this story saying “April Fool” so people don’t miss it.

Comment 13: Nick McGowan-Lowe, EPUK Website Editor, 15 July 2008, 02:58 PM

Mmmm – I think we’re going to need a bigger sign.

From today’s Guardian:

Comment 14: Nick McGowan-Lowe, EPUK Website Editor, 1 August 2008, 07:45 PM

I fell for it for a long while – hook, line and sinker.

“middle aged men with beards may not be allowed to photograph near schools, whilst Arabic speakers could be prevented from trainspotting.” – an absolute belter worthy of Chris Morris of Brass Eye infamy!

I salute you!!!

Comment 15: Geraint Bevan, 24 October 2008, 01:06 PM

photography is not a direct thret to any one persons safety

the police are treating this as a cival offence when people are just getting snaps of thire home town.

it is very bad that tripods are band from westminister goverment control zone

concerntrate on knife and gun crim not camera FUN !!!!!!!

Comment 16: joe, 22 February 2009, 09:40 PM

Don’t laugh – it could happen! Police are already using excuses to try and stop street photography.

Comment 17: David, 30 March 2009, 08:44 PM

I have to say this is very well written, should be required reading at all police stations across the UK, Em.. No wait, they might well take it as fact!

I caught on early to the ‘April 1st’ tag, however, what is sad is that it’s believable.
Being one that has been stopped already for taking holiday snaps, this is a bittersweet read.

Comment 18: Me Here, 1 April 2009, 10:22 AM

Sadly, this is not too far from the truth, not where I live anyway.

I am an editorial photographer working in Arabia. I have been arrested once for photographing a commercial facility from a public place.

You have to have all manner of permissions and permits and who knows what else to make pictures here. I think we’re going the down the same route in Britain. I remember once when it was a free country…

Comment 19: Guy with a camera, 4 April 2009, 07:02 PM

I got half way down that and could feel the outrage building…. B***stards!

Comment 20: wellybobs, 13 April 2009, 03:25 PM

Dickhead copper says: “Far too many people are carrying and using cameras in complete anonymity and absolutely nobody is keeping an eye on what they are doing with them. This is clearly a threat that makes it impossible for the public to feel safe.”

Wrong, sunshine. What “makes it impossible for the public to feel safe” is for innocent photographers to be treated as they were in Stalin’s Russia. It’s not the photographers who are the problem, matey, it’s you.

We don’t need any “photgraphy restrictions” in the first place. I remember when we had REAL terrorists who actually blew things up and killed people quite often. Nobody tried to stop people taking photos then.

This is just scaremongering crap used as an excuse to bring in totalitarian measures for no reason other than control freakery. The sooner we vote these dangerous clowns out of office the better.

Comment 21: Pigeon, 9 May 2009, 03:11 PM

“Cameras are potentially more dangerous than guns”…?
I will buy Guns instead of Cameras for my child next time.

Comment 22: Nobby, 28 October 2009, 07:30 AM

I know that it has been a while but this article was frighteningly prescient. I find it terrifying that most of the “facts” in this spoof piece are turning out to be true and correct.

People are being arrested for using normal cameras in public in the capital city of one of the “supposedly” free countries of the world. It is happening and it isn’t a joke. :(

God save the Queen and all who live under her.

Comment 23: Brian, 29 November 2009, 09:32 AM

Comment on this article

(Your email will not appear on your comment, but we cannot accept your comment without one. We won't give your email address to anyone else)
(You don't need to enter your website address, but if you do, your post will link to it)
 

EPUK reserves the right to edit or delete posts which the moderators feel are irrelevant, offensive, libelous, untrue or just plain nutty; and in extreme cases, to ban those who make them.


EPUK is discussing:

Alamy tells contributors EPUK letter is inaccurate and they will respond "'Can't pay but you'll get a credit": Will the BBC ever learn? Delays in receiving USCO certificates Is a shared image an infringed image? Whoops Getty Images! (profits drop 17% year-on-year)

What is EPUK?

EPUK is an email group for professional editorial photographers who want to talk business. We don’t do techie stuff or in-crowd gossip. We don’t talk cameras or computers. What we talk about are the nuts and bolts of being in business - like copyright, licensing, fees and insurance.

Donate to EPUK

EPUK is run on a not-for-profit basis, funded solely by advertising, donations and hosting other lists. You can make a donation to EPUK through Paypal here:

Donate Now with PayPal

Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors.