EPUK Editorial Photographers United Kingdom and Ireland. The private mailing list and public resource for editorial photographers

Telegraph 'coup' claims two more picture editors

28 September 2006 - EPUK

Two further picture desk redundancies at the Telegraph titles, and the announcement of the arrival date of Stuart Nicol comes amid a growing battle for control of the titles between editors and management

Supplements picture editor Sacha Lehrfreund and Telegraph Features Deputy Picture Editor Mike Rigby have been told that they are to be made redundant. The news means that five out of the seven most experienced picture editors at the Telegraph titles are now set to leave, with more redundancies still expected.

Sunday Telegraph picture editor Nigel Skelsey will leave this week, and is to be replaced by his deputy, Bet Lynch. Lynch, who is well respected by photographers, is understood to have the support of Sunday Telegraph editor Patience Wheatcroft who is resisting management pressure to merge the editorial departments of the daily and Sunday titles.

EPUK understands that incoming Executive Editor (Pictures) Stuart Nicol will take up his new role on the 16th October having now agreed his release from PA.

In the interim, outgoing Telegraph picture editor Bod Bodman has negotiated a ‘loyalty bonus’ which insiders believe to be “in five figures”. The bonus will mean that Bodman will remain in place until Stuart Nicol arrives next month.

“This is nothing short of a coup”

One insider told EPUK: “It was clear to everyone that as soon it was announced that Nicol was to be appointed over Bob Bodman that Bob would be resigning, and probably [Peter] Floyd and others too. Management must have known this too. This is really nothing short of a coup.”

Nicol told EPUK: “I would have loved to have worked with Bob Bodman, but its his decision to go”

“I’m not planning to make any changes to the existing photographers”, he told EPUK. “There are some really talented people there. My role is to consolidate the existing picture desk operations”.

Neither of the Telegraph titles now has staff photographers, with the Daily Telegraph having six contract photographers. The Sunday Telegraph, who let go their two contract photographers last year, now rely entirely on freelances.

Digital, web and print editions

Picture desk insiders have also questioned the new working schedules at Victoria, which will see the “visual content” desk working for 20 hours a day, with staff working ten hour shifts. The integration of the digital editions also creates two new deadlines each working day.

“Everything is being designed around the 4pm electronic edition, but we don’t know how successful that’s going to be, how long it’ll last, or how much revenue it’ll pull in. Whereas, we do happen to know that we’re pretty good at putting a newspaper together. We’ve been doing that for a while” said one insider.

Unofficial figures suggest that in the first week of running, an average of just 120 people a day accessed the “download-and-print” 4pm edition.

Figures provided by the Telegraph show that the web audience is almost entirely separate from the print audience, with just a 13% overlap between the two groups. The most recent ABC figures show average daily print sales of 900,000 a day and 5.6 million unique users per month on the website.

Morale at “rock bottom”

Meanwhile, morale at the Telegraph titles is now described as “rock bottom” by insiders, with some staff members reported to have being given verbal warnings from management for “negativity”.

While it is difficult at this stage to gauge the success of the newroom transformation, the omens don’t bode well. A major systems crash at the ‘state of the art’ Victoria last week would have paralysed production had not duplicate systems still been running at Canary Wharf.

“This is a cock up, pure and simple.” said one experienced journalist. “Moving office brings problems. Launching an electronic edition brings problems. Launching huge redundancies causes problems. Redesigning the role of each department brings problems. To do any one of these things in isolation is pretty brave. To do them all, makes [Telegraph editorial managing director] Will Lewis look absolutely crazy.”

Another Telegraph insider had a different viewpoint: “If Lewis pulls this off, it’ll be the making of him and [Telegraph chief executive] Murdoch MacLennan. But if he fails, he’ll be yesterday’s man, but MacLennan will be able to avoid the worst of the fallout.”

“Highly secretive and deceitful”

The move to Victoria and the redundancy process has been branded “highly secretive” and “deceitful” by the NUJ.

“This is the Barclays’ Wapping and they’ve done to the sub editors and journalists what Murdoch did to the printworkers.” one Telegraph staffer told EPUK. “It’s a case of, we’re moving, we’re changing, and you only get in the new building if you agree to the new terms”

The newsroom at Victoria has been closely guarded, with only full time staff who are not facing redundancy being allowed in. Under existing legislation, since the company is seeking more than 100 redundancies, there is a three-month consultation process before any decisions are made. However, those who have been told that their jobs may be under threat are not being allowed into the Victoria facility.

“Tearing the heart out of the paper”

“There’s an embargo on people who are being targeted for redundancy going to Victoria and that’s totally unacceptable if the consultation process is meant to be genuine” Barry Fitzpatrick, the NUJ’s national newspapers organiser told MediaGuardian.

The NUJ is expected to inform Telegraph management of an intended strike ballot on Monday, after fears over the 133 compulsary redundancies and changes to staff contracts. A recent vote at the Telegraph’s NUJ chapel over whether to hold a strike ballot was passed unanimously.

“They are tearing the heart out of this paper and each day that goes by they are doing it more and more,” said John Carey, father of the Telegraph chapel.

Want to contact the EPUK Website editor? editor@epuk.org

Comments

I think you are a couple of hours previous with your claim that the Telegraph has no staff photographers

Comment 1: Russell Cheyne, 29 September 2006, 07:22 am

So how many staff smudgers are left at the Telegraph? Are you the only one Rusty?

Comment 2: Pete Jenkins, 29 September 2006, 09:34 am

Comment on this article

 

EPUK reserves the right to edit or delete posts which the moderators feel are irrelevant, offensive, libelous, untrue or just plain nutty; and in extreme cases, to ban those who make them.


EPUK is discussing:

AI & potential changes to copyright law - A primer Copyright infringements abroad and how to manage themGDPR compliance issues DACS or PICSEL? Licensing Images for postcard printing ► Photographing in public places - where/when/is it allowed? Pricing for social media How to assert moral rights Chasing late payers Employing bailiffs to recover monies Can you sue a member of the House of Lords? OSINT for photographers

What is EPUK?

EPUK is an email group for professional editorial photographers who want to talk business. We don’t do techie stuff or in-crowd gossip. We don’t talk cameras or computers. What we talk about are the nuts and bolts of being in business - like copyright, licensing, fees and insurance.

Donate to EPUK

EPUK is run on a not-for-profit basis, funded solely by advertising, donations and hosting other lists. You can make a donation to EPUK through Paypal here:

Donate Now with PayPal

Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors.