| Get the EPUK Weekly News ! |
Once a week we put together a roundup of the week's photography, media and copyright news. It's interesting, free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime. So what's stopping you ?
| This week we discussed... |
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
|
Fury as NUJ "sells out" Drogheda photographers for 'closed shop' agreementIrish NUJ members are furious over a proposed house agreement with the Drogheda Independent group in which the union has agreed that newspaper photographs should in future be taken by reporters using cameraphones. |
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
25 July 2007
|
The proposed agreement, which has been recommended by both the NUJ’s Irish Organiser Des Fagan and Irish Secretary Seamus Dooley, offers a ‘closed shop’ agreement, where staff journalists must be members of the NUJ, in exchange for a key concession demanded by Drogheda Independent management of making news photography part of a reporter’s job description. If the deal goes through, it seems likely that the current photographers used by the title will be dropped, or their hours cut back. Currently, the titles depend primarily on a NUJ freelance photographer working on a 5 day contract. Other NUJ photographers spoken to by EPUK have expressed outrage that the organisation which they reply upon to defend their rights is endorsing a deal which would threaten their working practices. “The NUJ have sold out their photographers, pure and simple” said one freelance union member. “Everybody supports the Drogheda Independent Chapel in their negotiations but the agreement, as it is written, will undermine journalists and should not be endorsed by a Union that purports to represent freelancers” said Dublin-based freelance photographer and NUJ member Alan Murphy. “And therein lies a big question: does the NUJ really want to continue to represent the freelance photographer ?” “The general consensus among all the freelance photographers at the meeting last week was: What’s the point in paying your subs to an organisation that doesn’t look after you ?”, said Fran Caffrey, chairman of the Irish Eastern branch. No-confidence vote in Irish secretaryEPUK understands that there were attempts to bring a vote of no-confidence in Irish NUJ Secretary Seamus Dooley’s handling of the controversy at one emergency branch meeting last week. The vote could not go ahead for procedural reasons. Dooley is the most senior NUJ official in Ireland, and the third most senior in the overall NUJ hierarchy. While the negotiations have been ongoing for over six months, details of the controversial clause have only been known in the last few weeks. All the freelances spoken to found out the news via the Irish Photographers website rather than from the NUJ’s Dublin office. “It was only at the twelveth hour that we got wind of it”, one freelancer told EPUK. “I think it was kept secret, to see if it could be put through quietly so that no-one could object to it.” In that time, at least five NUJ branches and chapels have called extraordinary meetings to discuss the matter in what seasoned NUJ members have described as an “overwhelming” and “unprecedented” level of grassroots opposition. “Cameraphones are comparable to professional cameras”In a statement, the newspaper group said reporters would use their own cameraphones instead of company-supplied digital cameras. Declan Carlyle, Human Resources Director at the Drogeda Independent group told the NUJ: “It is not proposed to simply hand out digital cameras to all staff. One simply has to consider the advancement of digital cameras on mobile phones, where the current technology is comparable to professional equipment only a few short years ago.”
Also on this story…
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No comments have been added to this article yet. Why not
be the first ?
|
||||||
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © . Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|