| Get the EPUK Weekly News ! |
Once a week we put together a roundup of the week's photography, media and copyright news. It's interesting, free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime. So what's stopping you ?
| This week we discussed... |
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
|
Union endorses controversial Drogheda Independent agreementThe National Union of Journalists (NUJ) has refused to reject the controversial Drogheda Independent House Agreement. The proposed deal would see the union gaining a closed shop agreement and better terms for reporters, in return for agreeing that they can take photographs as part of their job. |
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
3 August 2007
|
In a statement released today, the Emergency Committee of the NUJ’s National Executive Committee (NEC) said there was “no impediment, either under rule or policy, to the signing of the Drogheda Independent house agreement by chapel officers and the appropriate officials of the NUJ.” The statement added: “The Committee expresses its full confidence in the leadership of the chapel which conducted lengthy negotiations in an open and consultative manner.” The statement can be read in full here In doing so it has rejected the recommendation from the Irish Executive Council (IEC) that the proposed house agreement should be rejected. The IEC last week voted 8 to 7 in favour of a motion “call[ing] on the National Executive Council to reject the Drogheda Independent House Agreement and to show leadership in assisting the chapel involved in re-negotiating the Agreement” The deal sees pay rises of up to Eu6000 for reporters, and the establishment of a ‘closed shop’ agreement. While there are no staff photographers on the title, the titles use freelance photographers and one contract photographer, all of whom look set to be affected by the decision. Just four months ago, the agreement would have been against the union’s own rulebook which stated that reporters should not normally do the job of photographers. The final decision, which looks set to strongly influence perceptions of the the union’s attitudes towards freelance photographers, was taken by just the six members of the Emergency National Executive Committee. General Secretary Jeremy Dear was not present at the meeting. The second motion passed last week by the IEC, which asked the NEC to make a statement condemning the use of cameras by reporters, included the word “immediately”. The use of this word was taken to mean that both IEC motions, including the Drogheda Independent motion which did not include the word, should be dealt with at an emergency meeting of the NEC, rather than the full 27-strong NEC which is not set to meet for another six weeks. Unlike the full NEC, the emergency NEC has no photographer members. The statement closed with: “This Committee condemns the abusive attacks and smears on the union and its officials in relation to this issue. The Committee places on record its complete confidence in all officials involved in negotiating the Drogheda Independent agreement.” Several photographers had told EPUK last week that they intended to leave the union if the deal was passed. Related storiesMost commented |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No comments have been added to this article yet. Why not
be the first ?
|
||||||
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © Edinburgh photographer Nick McGowan-Lowe. Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|