| EPUK Weekly News |
Once a week we put together a roundup of the week's photography, media and copyright news. It's free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.
| This week EPUK discussed ... |
The Bristol Film Office and their photography permits; The Independent publishing pictures without permission; the shift and day rates paid by the Dailies
… and …
why PR firms hire photographers just for show.
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
|
NUJ's Drogheda Independent deal is opposed by 80% of photographersAn EPUK survey of professional editorial photographers shows a clear grassroots opposition to the Drogheda Independent house agreement and strong dissatisfaction with the National Union of Journalists’s handling of the controversy. |
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
20 September 2007
|
The survey of 358 photographers reveals that 80.3% of all photographers “strongly” or “moderately” oppose the clause in the NUJ-negotiated house agreement with the Drogheda Independent against just 1.4% of photographers who support it. The level of dissatisfaction is most pronounced among photographers based in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland (NI/ROI), where there is 0% support for the clause, against 89% opposition. The Drogheda Independent house agreement has been strongly opposed by photographers when it was revealed at a late stage in the negotiations that the NUJ had agreed to a clause that would in future allow photographs to be taken by staff reporters at the titles. In a statement, management at the Irish newspaper indicated that they intended that any such photographs would be taken on cameraphones. Almost 85% of NI/ROI-based photographers opposed the controversial decision by the NUJ’s powerful National Executive emergency committee (eNEC) to ignore the recommendation of the union’s most senior body in Ireland that the house agreement should be rejected in it’s current form. Key Findings
89%
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No comments have been added to this article yet. Why not
be the first ?
|
||||||
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © Glasgow photographer Nick McGowan-Lowe. Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|