| EPUK News |
Get photography news updates direct to your Facebook page or Twitter feed. It's free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.
• By weekly email
| This week EPUK discussed ... |
Copyright infringements by MPs, taxation of interest on Payment Protection Insurance payouts, compulsory self-billing, the PLUS registry, finding a good copyright lawyer and ‘Stolen photographs: what to do?’ – Simon Crofts’ excellent article published right here on the EPUK web site.
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
Feeding off the corpse of photojournalismIt didn’t take long for the vultures to descend on the still warm corpse of photojournalism when EPUK published one of its most successful articles. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
15 August 2010
|
The article “For God’s sake, Somebody Call It” that EPUK published on 1st August has been lifted wholesale for a blast of self promotion by the London Photographic Association, a business claiming to “assist and advise our international membership on how to market themselves through the web.” They forgot the “unlawfully & dishonestly” bit. EPUK’s copyright article, in which Neil Burgess, a former Magnum boss and twice World Press Photo Chairman pronounced the death of photojournalism had become one of the most viewed features ever on the EPUK web site.
On 9th August, as EPUK’s web traffic soared, the LPA issued their own press release, and began plugging “their” article on Twitter. The present count of LPA tweets now tops 100. The LPA published EPUK’s article verbatim and without permission on their web site where their own copyright notice states “It is illegal to download / reproduce / use images appearing on this site … without … consent.” Neil Burgess and David Hoffman, whose work was illegally downloaded and reproduced without consent by the LPA, are not best pleased. Neither are the EPUK Moderators, especially as this ploy by the LPA seems designed to draw a serious amount of traffic away from EPUK – enriching the LPA at EPUK’s expense. An annual subscription to the LPA, who claim to promote the work of their membership “to the international advertising and editorial community” costs £125 for UK residents. Extra web traffic nicked from EPUK could make plagiarism quite profitable. Whether LPA members think that promotion by copyright theft is a good way to advance their careers is not a question the LPA addresses. When EPUK phoned the LPA for an explanation there was no answer. We left a message asking them to return our call as a matter of urgency. We have not received a reply. The file has been passed to EPUK’s lawyers who will be looking for proportionately substantial damages, an apology and an immediate takedown.
Text © EPUK 2010 Related storiesMost commented |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Comments on this article:
EPUK notes that the LPA have now removed the offending article in response to instructions from Neil Burgess. Comment #3 posted by Graham Harrison, EPUK Website Editor at 16 August, 06:28 PM Add your comments here:
|
||||||
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © Stirling photographer Nick McGowan-Lowe. Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|
I hope you get your apology, and a very public one, from LPA.
Comment #1 posted by Dave at 15 August, 06:06 PM