| Get the EPUK Weekly News ! |
Once a week we put together a roundup of the week's photography, media and copyright news. It's interesting, free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime. So what's stopping you ?
| This week we discussed... |
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
|
Nikon/Opodo 'rights-grabbing' competition rules changed after protestsThe entry rules of the Opodo Reflections photographic competition have been changed following an outcry over Nikon UK’s involvement in the ‘rights grabbing’ photographic competition. |
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
19 September 2006
|
Saturday 2pm update: The change, which EPUK understands was insisted upon by Nikon UK, follows a global backlash among both professional and amateur photographers in a controversy which has dominated photography forums worldwide since the story broke on www.epuk.org last Thursday. The camera giant, who describe themselves as “joint partners” with travel website Opodo in the eleven-month-long travel photography competition, admitted last week to EPUK that they hadn’t anticipated that the terms of the competition, which gave Opodo a right to use and sell any entries, were likely to be controversial. The original terms stated:
The new terms state:
However, the new terms are not retrospective, and so Opodo can still continue to use any entries made under the old rules. Opodo told EPUK: “We would like to assure you that the aim in running this promotion, in conjunction with Nikon, was to give people the opportunity to win a number of excellent prizes and also to enable them to display and share their images and passion for travel with Opodo and other travel enthusiasts. “Our intention was under no circumstances to upset the photographers who enter the competition and we have therefore amended our terms and conditions accordingly.” Related storiesMost commented |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Comments on this article:
Its an absolute disgrace that Nikon would do such things, and who wasnt thinking there, I hope they took measurements against the person who approved this scheme, I have been a Nikon user from day 1,at this has caused me to loose faith in company that was supposed to a top leader. Comment #4 posted by Darren R at 7 June, 12:48 PM Add your comments here:
|
||||||
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © Edinburgh photographer Nick McGowan-Lowe. Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|
Did it really need all this for Nikon to see what a stupid idea this was going to be? They really should have known better from the start. Other companies, beware! Copyright grabs are not acceptable, and will not be tolerated where they are found.
Comment #1 posted by Tim Gander at 21 September, 09:19 AM